The law reforming the abortion law was enacted on July 1, 2017 and eliminated the need for two doctors to examine a woman before the 14th week of pregnancy, introduced a 150-meter “safe access zone” around clinics, removed the parental consent requirement for the procedure, and provided for the possibility of prescribing medical abortion tablets.  The 2018 interpretation report recorded 742 abortions in the past 12 months, of which 73% were medical abortions with tablets before the 9th week of pregnancy, with the remaining 27% performed in hospital. Since the amendment of the law, 99.33% of abortions have been performed before the 14th week of pregnancy.  It has also led to a reduction in waiting times in a public hospital for surgical abortion, with political and economic implications for health.  Of these three judges, only Kirby A-CJ provided a detailed analysis and analysis of the test presented in R. v. Wald. His views on when abortion is not illegal in New South Wales were ultimately more liberal than the Newman and Levine judgments. Whitlam also funded women`s centers and sanctuaries, as well as Medibank, the precursor to Medicare. When it was introduced in July 1975, all women who received “legal” abortions could receive a rebate (grant) that covered most of the cost of the procedure throughout Australia. “There were a number of concessions along the way to pass this legislation [in 1998], and I think they proved that it created barriers for women who have access to safe abortions,” Sanderson said. It is a criminal offence to harass, intimidate, threaten, obstruct, obstruct or suffer or fear a person within 150 metres of a reproductive health clinic where abortions are performed. In 2018, 7,816 induced abortions were recorded, according to the latest figures released by WA Health.
It also expressed concern that allowing access to abortion could allow abortions based on a preference for a particular sex of the child. In the Australian Capital Territory, references to abortion as a criminal offence were removed by the Crimes (Abolition of Abortion) Act 2002. Prior to this, the abortion law was for many years governed by jurisdiction under sections 82 to 84 of the New South Wales Crimes Act 1900. Abortion care is now governed by health care laws, standards, guidelines and professional ethics that apply to the entire health care system. It has taken more than a decade to overthrow this power, and there are still costs and access issues that prevent women from performing medical abortions as well as surgical abortions. The split is important because it exacerbates the significant differences between criminal laws affecting abortion in different parts of Australia and the uncertainties surrounding the meaning of these laws. Each of the penal codes replaced the principles of interpretation and offences contained in the common law and replaced them with a supposedly comprehensive account of the criminal law in that jurisdiction. As a result, court decisions in criminal matters in jurisdictions not covered by the Criminal Code are not necessarily convincing in jurisdictions with a Criminal Code. This is not to say that common law doctrine and decisions are still not relevant to the interpretation of the Criminal Code.
Rather, it means that the interpretation of the criminal law in jurisdictions other than the code cannot necessarily be considered persuasive or determinative in determining the meaning of a provision of a criminal code. (5) In general, the courts of Western Australia and Tasmania were more willing than the courts of Queensland and the Northern Territory to incorporate common law interpretations and principles into the criminal code under their jurisdiction. (6) Australia`s abortion laws were originally based on 19th century British criminal prohibitions. It was forbidden unless an abortion was performed to save a woman`s life. These laws largely (and still cover) a woman`s mental health as a factor in her risky life. Her own history of mental health is littered with ambiguity, which has also led to a lot of confusion over abortion law. In the decade since Levine, courts in New South Wales have had (or almost some) opportunity to review or apply this judgment on several occasions: the Skinner case (1974), the Liverpool Women`s Health Centre case (1975) and the Smart case (1981). However, none of these cases gave rise to a judicial objection to Levine. The second case involved an abortion performed in 1975 at the Liverpool Women`s Health Centre on a 15-and-a-half-year-old girl without her parents` knowledge or permission. The doctor who performed the abortion was charged with unlawfully causing a miscarriage under section 83 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and a nurse who worked at the clinic was charged with aiding and abetting. Both defendants were tried, but the charges were later dropped. There was therefore no possibility for a court to consider the argument that the defendants had acted unlawfully because the doctor had concluded that the abortion was necessary to prevent harm to the pregnant girl`s mental and physical health, without examining the patient herself, but only on the basis of conversations the girl had had with the nurse.
(73) States and territories all have different rules on when and how women have access to dismissal. Western Australia is the only state or territory where abortion remains subject to the criminal code. South Australia is the latest country to decriminalize abortion, with changes starting July 7. “Safe access zones” around clinics that offer abortions were only recently regulated by law in Western Australia in 2021. Prior to 2008, abortion law was based on Victorian Crimes Act as interpreted by the 1969 Menhennitt decision in R. v. Davidson. According to the ruling, abortions were legal if necessary to protect the woman from a serious danger to her life or health – beyond the normal dangers of pregnancy and childbirth – that would occur if the pregnancy were to continue, and is not disproportionate to the danger avoided. Menhennitt`s decision remained the basis of Victoria`s abortion law until the Abortion Act Reform Act 2008 (Vic) decriminalised abortions up to a 24-week pregnancy limit.
This case involved the prosecution of two doctors, Dr. Peter Bayliss and Dr. Dawn Cullen, under Queensland regulations, criminalizing abortion. Specifically, they were charged under section 224 of the Queensland Criminal Code for an abortion they had performed at the Greenslopes Fertility Control Clinic in Brisbane.